Cases 101 - 110 of 8,956
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plechner v. Haynes
as 3:2024cv05187
Petitioner:
Richard Plechner
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritenburgh v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05185
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ritenburgh
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Victor Tuli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullington v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05190
Plaintiff:
Shawn Matthew Fullington
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ingmire-Lopez v. Whatcom County Jail
as 2:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Darrell Lee Ingmire-Lopez
Respondent:
Whatcom County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
Howard Bennett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Valdez v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05168
Petitioner:
Samuel F Valdez
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez-Macedo v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Rodriguez-Macedo
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
