Cases 111 - 120 of 9,060
Kloepfel v. Hammer et al
as 3:2024cv05456
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Joseph Kloepfel
Defendant:
Hammer and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05442
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Robert Lucas Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05432
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Larson v. Clallam County Medical et al
as 3:2024cv05435
Defendant:
Clallam County Medical, Brian King, Wellpath Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Leroy Larson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05433
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00779
Defendant:
Robert Fuller, Keri Walters, Brian Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Xavier Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stowers v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00814
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jana Stowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sandoval v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00789
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Ysela Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rudder v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05418
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Brandon Marshall
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Inslee et al
as 3:2024cv05417
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, Jennifer Rheaume and Jay Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
