Cases 111 - 120 of 8,923
Ahmadi v. King County
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ratib Ahmadi
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. American Behavioral Health Systems et al
as 2:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
American Behavioral Health Systems, Mulmur, Zaun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercado v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Erik Mercado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
White v. Troyer et al
as 3:2024cv05101
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loran White
Defendant:
Ed Troyer, Brent Bomkamp, Patti Jackson-Kidder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Everett et al
as 2:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
City of Everett, City of Marysville, John Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2023cv06191
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ironwill v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06146
Plaintiff:
Maximus Futuro Ironwill
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Legislation, Washington State Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Fortney et al
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
Bradly M Cunningham
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Stan White, Mike Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Everett, City of Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv01883
Petitioner:
Jesse R Gonzales and Jesse Gonzales
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
