Cases 121 - 130 of 8,923
Tillman v. Stanbury et al
as 2:2023cv01929
Plaintiff:
Lamone L Tillman and Lamone L Tillman, Sr
Defendant:
Bo Stanbury, Shafeen Rahman and B Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Crews v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv06145
Plaintiff:
Brandon Crews and Brandon Rishawn Crews
Defendant:
Patty Jackson, Pierce County Council and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feola v. Perkins
as 3:2024cv05078
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Feola
Respondent:
Jefferey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv05077
Plaintiff:
Devon Marteen Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Young, John Ringer and Mary Robinette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby v. Morner et al
as 2:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jon Irby
Defendant:
Jack Morner, Kevin Bowen and Ronald Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv06147
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Washington State Penitentiary, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallette v. Warner
as 2:2023cv01844
Petitioner:
Xavier Gabriel Mallette
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezell v. McCann
as 2:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamell Ezell
Defendant:
Shawna McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurley v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv06091
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hurley and Ricky
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
