Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Lewis et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 2:2017cv01916
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lewis
Defendant:
City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, King County Department of Adult Detention and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. WCC Staff et al
as 2:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Jon Jason King
Defendant:
WCC Staff, John Doe 1-10, Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05129
Plaintiff:
Keith Adair Davis
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, G Hammond, ADA Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karkunov v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv05231
Plaintiff:
Albert Karkunov
Defendant:
Julieann C Smith, Lisa J. Oliver-Estes, Shari Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Russell et al
as 3:2013cv05079
Plaintiff:
Ricky Anthony Young
Defendant:
Scott Russell, Dan White, Jean Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury v. Roher et al
as 3:2012cv05772
Plaintiff:
Jerry M Jury
Defendant:
L Roher, Department of Corrections, Client May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05421
Plaintiff:
Jason Cox
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Dan Pacholke, Pat Glebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debbs v. Harborview Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Eural Dewayne Debbs, Sr
Defendant:
Harborview Medical Center, Sean Dumas, Chief Medical Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cetaj v. King County et al
as 2:2011cv02176
Plaintiff:
Valmir Cetaj
Defendant:
King County , King County Department of Corrections , Music and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cater v. King County et al
as 2:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Sir Jonz Cater
Defendant:
King County, Hikari Tamuroy, David Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
