Cases 71 - 80 of 8,923
Serrano v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05259
Petitioner:
Ramil A Serrano
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bosarge v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Milton Wayne Bosarge
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullington v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05190
Plaintiff:
Shawn Matthew Fullington
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivie v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05254
Petitioner:
Martin Stanley Ivie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis v. Skagit County et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert H Lewis, III
Defendant:
Skagit County, Skagit Valley Hospital, Emergency Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salanoa v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05126
Plaintiff:
Muelu Salanoa, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05122
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hagos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Victor Tuli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05243
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
