Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Rhodes River Ranch, Inc. v. Dickerson
as 2:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Rhodes River Ranch Inc
Defendant:
Dustin Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaseburg et al v. Port of Seattle et al
as 2:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Scott Kaseburg , Kathryn Kaseburg , Martin Fedigan and others
Defendant:
Port of Seattle , Puget Sound Energy Inc and King County
Counter_claimant:
King County and Puget Sound Energy Inc
Counter_defendant:
Jie Ao , Barbara Bergstrom , Charles Billow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dickerson v. Uttecht
as 3:2013cv05085
Petitioner:
James Ernest Dickerson
Respondent:
Jeferey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickerson v. Uttecht
as 3:2013cv05068
Petitioner:
James Ernest Dickerson
Respondent:
Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steed v. Scott et al
as 3:2012cv06058
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Steed
Defendant:
Mary Scott , Dickerson and Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Hayden et al
as 3:2012cv05804
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Dickerson
Defendant:
John Francis Hayden and Brian Paul Coughenour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2012cv05708
Plaintiff:
Carolina Dickerson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dickerson v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Carolina Dickerson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dickerson v. Western Union Safeway Renton et al
as 2:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Western Union Safeway Renton, Aladdin Bail Bonds, Liberty Bail Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Renton Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01197
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Renton Police Department, Walker, Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
