Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Cabot Hosiery Mills, Inc v. Cloudline Apparel, LLC
as 2:2016cv00043
Defendant:
Cloudline Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cabot Hosiery Mills, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Mills, et al v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 2:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Deann R Mills and Victor Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , P Hisa , J Vivet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2014cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Allen , Lawrence J Allen , Vivian Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , Boeing Commercial Airplanes , Landau Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Mills v. Bank of America NA et al
as 3:2014cv05238
Plaintiff:
Scott C Mills
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , Bishop White Marshall and Weibel PS and Black Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day v. Roberts et al
as 2:2014cv00381
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Defendant:
Debra Roberts, Chris Sprowls, Lynda Barack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips et al v. Cane et al
as 2:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mark E Phillips and New DOT Corporation
Defendant:
Kyleen Elisabeth Cane, Juanita Mary Jardine, Chloe Jardine-Cutler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC v. Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00008
Plaintiff:
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC
Defendant:
Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
Garnishee:
KeyBank
Boeing Employees' Credit Union v. Minette et al
as 2:2013mc00173
Plaintiff:
Boeing Employees' Credit Union
Defendant:
Scott Minette and Cynthia M Minette
Garnishee:
Image Mill Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
