Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Cleverley v. Campbell
as 3:2009cv05663
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cleverley
Defendant:
Michael Lane Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lane v. Micro-Focus (US) Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
David Lane and David Lane
Defendant:
Micro-Focus (US) Inc, Kevin Moultrup, Dennis Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Schafer v. Horne et al
as 3:2009cv05247
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Schafer
Defendant:
Gerald Horne and Terry Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richey v. Lane
as 3:2009cv05195
Plaintiff:
Thomas WS Richey
Defendant:
William Lane
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Addleman v. King County et al
as 2:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr
Defendant:
King County, King County Sheriff's Office, Patty Shelledy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Addleman v. King County et al
as 2:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr
Defendant:
King County, King County Sheriff's Office, Patty Shelledy and others
Addleman et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009mc00006
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr, Michael Harwood Anagnos and William Alvie Marlow
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Roberta F. Kanive and others
Levy et al v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv05694
Plaintiff:
Percy Levy
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Patrick Glebe, Catherine Baum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Extendicare Homes Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01332
Plaintiff:
Howard Steele, Howard Steele, Howard Steele and others
Defendant:
Extendicare Homes Inc, Extendicare Homes Inc, Extendicare Homes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cherry Lane Holdings Inc v. Sternthal
as 2:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Cherry Lane Holdings Inc and Cherry Lane Holdings Inc
Defendant:
Andrew Sternthal and Andrew Sternthal
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
