Cases 1 - 10 of 1,145
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Coenmans v. Bakon Bakkerijmachines USA Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
FRANK COENMANS
Defendant:
LUC IMBREHECHTS and BAKON BAKKERIJ MACHINES, USA INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC et al v. Ropka
as 2:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC, Intact Services USA LLC and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sandra Ropka
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slick v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Slick
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
