Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Obregon v. Buesgen
as 2:2022cv01513
Petitioner:
Andrew M Obregon
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chmielewski v. Sargent
as 2:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Edward A Chmielewski
Defendant:
Steven Andrew Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson, Titus v. Radtke, Dylan et al
as 2:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Defendant:
Warden Dylan Radtke, Kevin Carr, Zitek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorgay v. Syndom et al
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Robert Dorgay
Defendant:
Denise Syndom, Neil Thoreson, Angelique Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Hooks
Defendant:
Steven Schmidt, Katrina L Dorrow-Stevens, Drew Weycker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Rozmarynoski
as 2:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Andrew Morris
Defendant:
Sgt Tonia Rozmarynoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seekamp v. Lannoye
as 2:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Seekamp
Defendant:
Lt Lannoye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isom v. Hepp et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Isom
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Cheryl A Jeanpierre, Ann York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pein v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Andrew S Pein
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henderson v. Litscher et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Crandall Henderson
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
