Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Boehm et al v. Podraza
as 2:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm and Paul Spinelli
Defendant:
Joel Podraza doing business as Mil City Collectibles
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sharick v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church Inc
as 2:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Scott Sharick
Defendant:
Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church, Inc. and Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Design Basics LLC et al v. Joseph Scott Homes LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01389
Defendant:
Joseph Scott Homes, LLC, JMJ RE Holdings LLC, Michael S Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Design Basics LLC, Plan Pros, Inc. and Plan Pros Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boehm v. Lazarczyk
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Chris Lazarczyk
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Boehm v. Moncher
as 2:2019cv00943
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm
Defendant:
Richard Moncher
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ruekert & Mielke Inc v. Daniel
as 2:2018cv01164
Plaintiff:
Ruekert & Mielke, Inc. and Ruekert & Mielke Inc
Defendant:
Scott Daniel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cook v. Diesel et al
as 2:2017cv00913
Plaintiff:
James S Cook
Defendant:
Vin Diesel, Rob Cohen, Neal H Moritz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Encap LLC v. OMS Investments Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01532
Plaintiff:
Encap LLC
Defendant:
OMS Investments Inc, The Scotts Company LLC and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Design Basics LLC et al v. Winfield Homes LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00611
Plaintiff:
Design Basics LLC , Plan Pros Inc and Prime Designs Inc
Defendant:
Winfield Homes LLC, Winfield Corporation Inc, Winfield Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Encap LLC v. The Scotts Company LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00685
Defendant:
The Scotts Company LLC, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company LLC and OMS Investments Inc
Plaintiff:
Encap LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
