Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Clark v. County of Manitowoc et al
as 1:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Clark, Sr
Defendant:
County of Manitowoc, Jason Jost, Administration of Manitowoc County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Siliunas et al
as 2:2014cv01408
Defendant:
Mindas V Siliunas, Larry Sprung, A. Khaze and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd N Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoaglan et al v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Estate of Craig King
Defendant:
Danielle Foster , William Golden , Sarah Kropp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lim v. Courtcall Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Courtcall Inc, Courtcall LLC, Scott Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ruthelle Frank , Carl Ellis , Justin Luft and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker , Thomas Barland , Gerald Nichol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wisconsin Carry Inc et al v. City of Brookfield et al
as 2:2010cv00881
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Carry Inc and Krysta Sutterfield
Defendant:
City of Brookfield, Grant B Palick, Mark A Tushaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf v. Raemisch et al
as 2:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Scott A Metcalf
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Ruth Donalds and Sarah Theirmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios v. Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare et al.
as 2:2007cv01141
Plaintiff:
Margarita Rios, J O and E S
Defendant:
Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, Frank Gault, Sara Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
