Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Young v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Gordon Redell Young
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Acker, Dr Suziwatki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Bernard T Gordon, Sr
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Green Bay Correctional Institution and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Martin
as 2:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Otis Gordon
Defendant:
Jed Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Royston
as 2:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Otis Gordon
Defendant:
Jacob Royston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Fuchs
as 1:2022cv00640
Petitioner:
Arlis W Gordon
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Estate of Brian Collins et al v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Brian Collins, Breon Gordon-Collins, Ajanae Gordon-Collins and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation, C.O. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01221
Plaintiff:
Bernard T Gordon
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Shurpit et al
as 2:2020cv01541
Plaintiff:
Dontrell L Gordon, Sr
Defendant:
J Bovee, Brad Hompe, M Patta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Winkleski
as 2:2020cv00560
Petitioner:
Samterious Gordon
Respondent:
Winkleski and Dan Winkleski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2019cv01583
Defendant:
M. Bones, Dr Bonnie Mitchell, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Dontrell L Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
