Cases 31 - 40 of 405
Schulteis v. Oakhill Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Michael Schulteis
Defendant:
Oakhill Correctional Institution and Warden Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blunt v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Lamarr Deprice Blunt
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brookshire v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Dennis J Brookshire
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Brushae Brown
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Y Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
James M Brooks
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Waupun Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Henry L Watson, III
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Department of Corrections, Governor Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Gregory Tucker
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poirier v. Gierach et al
as 2:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Eric W Poirier
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Warden Michael Gierach, Angela Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sease v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Daniel D Sease
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Well et al
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Harry Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Well, Sgt Lipski, Ms G and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
