Cases 31 - 40 of 604
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Allen v. FII USA Inc
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Scotty Allen
Defendant:
FII USA Inc doing business as Foxconn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roffers et al v. Kimberly-Clark USA, LLC
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Steven Roffers and Bryan Lehner
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Kaplan v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Julie Kaplan
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortiz v. USA
as 1:2022cv01446
Petitioner:
Ruben Ortiz, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Professional Account Management v. Kapsch Trafficcom USA, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01062
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT, LLC, KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM USA, INC., Professional Account Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Newman v. Luvata Appleton LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Wayman Newman
Defendant:
Luvata Appleton LLC and Mitsubishi Materials USA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Van Elzen v. Advisors Ignite USA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
David Van Elzen
Defendant:
Advisors Ignite USA LLC and Steven DeJohn
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
