Cases 41 - 50 of 171
Traxler v. Shertz et al
as 2:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lyle F Traxler
Defendant:
Brian Shertz, Ashley Haseleu, Brian Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tegels
as 2:2022cv00717
Petitioner:
Andreas L Moore
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Pioneer Metal Finishing LLC
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moore
Defendant:
Pioneer Metal Finishing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Samuel J White
Defendant:
Mary A Moore, Randall R Hepp, Emily E Propson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durley v. York et al
as 2:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Timothy Durley
Defendant:
Ann York, Megan Leberak, Andrea Bleecher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Tapio et al
as 2:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Lengeorge M Burns
Defendant:
Nathan Tapio, MD Martin, Mary Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weston v. Weinman et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Henry Weston
Defendant:
Robert Weinman, Mary Moore, Aimee Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isom v. Hepp et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Isom
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Cheryl A Jeanpierre, Ann York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Meli et al
as 2:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Latu I Hampton
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Chrystal Meli, Brian Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
