Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Session v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv01510
Plaintiff:
Lamont D Session
Defendant:
Kenosha County Jail HSU, Dr Feinger, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luchinski v. Thurmer et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Shawn Luchinski
Defendant:
Michael Thurmer , Michael Meisner, Gary Ankarlo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laumann v. Raemisch et al
as 2:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nickolas J Laumann
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch , Paul Sumnicht, Charles Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maus v. Pollard et al
as 2:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
William Pollard, Pete Erickson, Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility et al
as 1:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jerry Means
Defendant:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Ronald Benisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mabra v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Monte R Mabra
Defendant:
Gonzales, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Barbara Framer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buford v. Pollard et al
as 1:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Donald Buford
Defendant:
William Pollard, Michael Baenen, Peter Ericksen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Irby v. Smith et al
as 2:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Leon Irby
Defendant:
Amy Smith, Welcome F Rose, Michael S Thurmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Pickle et al
as 2:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Manuel Williams
Defendant:
Officer Pickle, Officer Fullmer, Officer Kazick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hohol v. Jess et al
as 2:2007cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Michael Beck, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
