Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis, Nancy et al v. City of Beloit et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nancy Davis, Tye M. Gustina, Kenneth J. Klass and others
Defendant:
City Of Beloit, Wisconsin, Nancy V. Forbeck, Yusuf Adama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leon, Jose v. The United States et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jose Israel Leon
Defendant:
The United States, Department of Defense - U.S., Department of Justice - C.I.A. Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Del Rio, Cesar v. Marshall Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department and Joseph Nickel
Plaintiff:
Cesar Jesus Gonzalo Del Rio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaddix, Marshall v. Keetons Corrections, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00477
Plaintiff:
Marshall Shaddix
Defendant:
Keetons Corrections, Inc., John Gaither, Lester Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. U.S. Fed Marshals et al
as 3:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
U.S. Fed Marshals and State Bank La Crosse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. HOLM
as 3:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
MARK D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
WILLIAM HOLM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. Bittelman et al
as 3:2008cv00411
Plaintiff:
MARK D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
Travis Bittelman, Brian Nelimaier and Michael Fink
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
