Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marcum et al v. Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jason Marcum and Casandra Marcum
Defendant:
Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fisher, Jr. et al v. Hutchman et al
as 5:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles Marshall Fisher, Jr. and Mary Fisher
Defendant:
Merle E. Hutchman, Quality Carriers, Inc. and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall County Commission v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00013
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall County Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Marshall County Coal Company et al v. Oliver et al
as 5:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
The Marshall County Coal Company , The Marion County Coal Company , The Monongalia County Coal Company and others
Defendant:
John Oliver, Charles Wilson, Partially Important Productions, LLC and others
Amicu:
ACLU of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Marshall County Coal Company et al v. The New York Times, Company
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
The Marshall County Coal Company , The Marion County Coal Company , The Monongalia County Coal Company and others
Defendant:
The New York Times, Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert et al v. McAnninch et al
as 5:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Lana Gilbert and Carl J. Gilbert
Defendant:
James A. Hoyer , The West Virginia National Guard , Marshall County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Marshall County Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
James A. Hoyer , The West Virginia National Guard and The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Harper v. United States Marshal Service
as 3:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harper
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
