Cases 51 - 60 of 103
McKenzie v. Delong et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Justin Paul McKenzie
Defendant:
Joseph Delong, Administrator for Central Regional Jail, Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, (1), John Doe, (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Givens v. John Doe 1 et al
as 5:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, K. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 3:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, 1, John Doe , 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scates v. Doe et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
David M Scates
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VanHoose v. Pszczolkowksi et al
as 2:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Meredith VanHoose
Defendant:
Karen Pszczolkowksi, Brandy Miller, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hazelton HSA - Director - FCI et al
as 1:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
Hazelton HSA - Director - FCI, James Nolte, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chewning v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jason Chewning
Defendant:
John Doe and The West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lesane v. The United States Government Federal Bureau Of Prisons (FBOP) et al
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Eric Jamel Lesane
Defendant:
The United States Government Federal Bureau Of Prisons (FBOP), The SaFariland Group, Charles E. Samules and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berryman v. Mullen et al
as 1:2016cv00047
Defendant:
Mullen, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Berryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
