Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Nevman v. West Virginia Parole Board et al
as 3:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Nevman
Defendant:
West Virginia Parole Board and West Virginia Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chewning v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jason Chewning
Defendant:
John Doe and The West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Salem Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Salem Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Gaujot et al
as 2:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
Phillip D. Gaujot, Edmund Rollo, Stephen Fitiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Gaujot et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
Phillip D. Gaujot, Edmund Rollo, Stephen Fitiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Attorney General State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
Attorney General State of West Virginia, Bird Song, Meed or Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saoud v. USA
as 1:2016cv00073
Petitioner:
Allen G. Saoud
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien, FCI Hazelton, Irene M. Keeley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stone v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2016cv00028
Petitioner:
Charles K. Stone
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2016cv00007
Petitioner:
Teresa Miller
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
