Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Cicchiello v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joan Cicchiello
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Lovett, Warden Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cicchiello v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joan Cicchiello
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Lovett, Warden Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritchey v. Sayre et al
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Francie Irvin Ritchey
Defendant:
D.T. Sayre, Elkins Police Department and Chief T. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. United States of American (sic)
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
United States of American (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 5:2019cv00147
Petitioner:
Holly Neil Bennett
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shy v. Kissel et al
as 1:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Prime Care Medical-Eastern Regional Jail, Jennifer Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexander Shy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kallis
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
S. Kallis, Jared Rardin, J. A. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Kallis et al
as 5:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
S. Kallis, Dunn, Other Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, (1), John Doe, (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
