Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Mori, Ms. Lanely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, A. Mori, Ms. Lanely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Oddo et al
as 2:2015cv00068
Defendant:
L. Oddo, E. A. Earwin, K. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Washington, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Defendant:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP et al
as 5:2015cv00016
Petitioner:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Respondent:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caver v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Calvin Caver
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, Eric A. Earwin, D. Koscianski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buford v. Gilley et al
as 5:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
George Willie Buford, III
Defendant:
J. Gilley, Thomas McGee, T. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lane v. Trent
as 2:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
David Allen Lane
Respondent:
George E. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ibarra-Villalva v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Gallick, Wolerer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
