Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Riches et al v. Archdale et al
as 5:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Francis Ford Coppola
Defendant:
Wallace D. Archdale and Charles Sagg, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches et al v. Van Horn et al
as 2:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Edward Coker
Defendant:
Kenneth Van Horn and Francis Boots
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lydon v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Francis Lydon and Francis Lydon
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Hill v. USA
as 1:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Hill
Defendant:
USA, Joyce Francis, Valerie Rappold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Francis et al
as 1:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Roy Steve Davis
Defendant:
Joyce Francis, M. Veltri and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spencer v. Mace et al
as 2:2007cv00093
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Spencer
Defendant:
E. Mace, Janet Bunts and Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Griffin v. Francis
as 3:2007cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Lee Griffin
Defendant:
Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bethea v. Francis
as 3:2007cv00137
Plaintiff:
Terence K Bethea
Defendant:
Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McLean v. Francis
as 2:2007cv00083
Petitioner:
Clifton E. McLean
Respondent:
Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Everett v. Francis et al
as 5:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Everett
Defendant:
Joyce Francis, Valorie Rappold, Karen Lambright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
