Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Salazar v. Holder et al
as 3:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ricky Salazar
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Munoz v. DeBoo et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Roberto Pena Munoz
Defendant:
Kuma DeBoo, Dentist, Director Of Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hutton v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2013cv00186
Petitioner:
Orville M. Hutton
Respondent:
State of West Virginia , Patrick Morrissey, Joseph Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Friedman v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Friedman
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Judd v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00145
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin, U S Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodrigues v. Holder
as 5:2010cv00053
Petitioner:
Martinho Tavares Rodrigues
Respondent:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Soria v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Enrique Meza Soria
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin, Eddie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cross et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
Jahmar D. Smith
Respondent:
James N. Cross, Harley G. Lappin and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Nunez Ramos
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Kuma J. DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
