Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Woods v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 3:2018cv00090
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2018cv00008
Petitioner:
JAMES C. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and US Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2016cv00080
Petitioner:
GEORGE E. HARE
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boykin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Boykin, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M. Ehlers, Al F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Figiel
as 5:2016cv00044
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb
Respondent:
Steven Figiel and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINOR-BEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00030
Petitioner:
EDWARD M. MINOR-BEY
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinkney v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2014cv00141
Petitioner:
Leroy T. Pinkney
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
