Cases 71 - 80 of 128
In re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2014md02511
Plaintiff:
Tamatha Dickerson (WVSD CA 2:14-10693) , Eugenie Marie Thomas (WVSD CA 2:14-10694) , Tina Carpenter (WVSD CA 2:14-10721) and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy-Knox v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10352
Plaintiff:
Linda Murphy-Knox
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10376
Plaintiff:
Jean Murphy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv08313
Plaintiff:
Joyce C. Murphy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv05841
Plaintiff:
Brandy A. Murphy and Bobby Murphy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04927
Plaintiff:
Beatrice E. Murphy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Murphy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Murphy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ruiz , Deborah Fairbanks , Lovina Serbus and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parrott v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
Tina Murphy Parrott
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
