Cases 21 - 30 of 1,385
J. A. H. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
J. A. H. and J. S., IV
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
K.A.D. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
K. A. D. and B. D. G.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Ravin Crossbows, LLC
as 2:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Christine L. Smith
Defendant:
Ravin Crossbows, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davis
as 2:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munsey v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Munsey
Defendant:
Doyle Smith and North American Industrial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv00695
Plaintiff:
Traci L. Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunford et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00347
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
T.N. Dunford and Tiffany M. Dunford
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
James et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Miami-Luken, Inc., SpecGx LLC and others
Plaintiff:
P. R. James and Jeffrey James
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv00200
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Prater et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Defendant:
KNL, Inc. and Brandon Prater
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Davis Smith and Jonathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
