Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Vanwingen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23685
Plaintiff:
Caren Vanwingen and Garri Vanwingen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garris v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19832
Plaintiff:
Mildred Garris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKean et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv16857
Plaintiff:
Donna L. McKean and Garry E. McKean
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michel v. Bharara et al
as 5:2014cv14443
Plaintiff:
Garry Michel
Defendant:
Preetinder Bharara, Benjamin Allee, Andrew A. Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haws et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10824
Plaintiff:
Bonnie L. Haws and Garry Haws
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Templeton et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10517
Plaintiff:
Betty Sue Templeton and Garry Leon Templeton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayfield et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09273
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A. Mayfield and Garry E. Mayfield
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCaskill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv03681
Plaintiff:
Terry McCaskill and Garry McCaskill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mckinnish et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv03525
Plaintiff:
Donna Mckinnish and Garry Mckinnish
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Law et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02977
Plaintiff:
Beverly Law and Garry Law
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
