Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Ramsey et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01552
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Ramsey and Jesse H. Crawford, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company v. Bible Baptist Church et al
as 2:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bible Baptist Church , James Waldeck , Blue Creek Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Helton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15869
Plaintiff:
Diana F. Helton and Jess Helton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavazos et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15439
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Cavazos and Jesse Cavazos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12390
Plaintiff:
Ann Canter and Jesse L. Canter, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duty et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv12127
Plaintiff:
Virginia Duty and Jesse H. Duty
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buzzard v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv11428
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jess v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10054
Plaintiff:
Roseann Jess
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09870
Plaintiff:
Marvolene Thornton and Jesse Thornton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv08482
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Blair and Jesse Blair
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
