Cases 61 - 70 of 1,987
Rodriguez Flores v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00183
Petitioner:
Diana Estefan Rodriguez Flores
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Soto v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Claudia Vega Soto
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vasquez-Morales v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Magnolia Vasquez-Morales
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosas v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Liliana Rosas
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowan v. O'Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
George Rowan
Defendant:
Nurse O'Sullivan and Nurse Tanigawa
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonseca v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Maria Fonseca
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burns v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Donald Burns
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Melvin H. Fujino, Edmund Fred Hyun and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas-Luna v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00140
Petitioner:
Maria Vargas-Luna
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hemon v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
Pastora Hemon
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coates v. Cluney et al
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Scott Coates
Defendant:
Shannon Cluney, Scott Harrington, Lyle Antonio and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
