Social Security Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 141 - 150 of 13,009
Moore v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Trenton J. Moore
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Serocke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: Courtney Serocke
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hardy v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: Tabitha Hardy
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Larie Roland Johnson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Friesz v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Mike Loren Friesz
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chmiel v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff: Mark E Chmiel
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCoy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04016
Plaintiff: Dawn A. McCoy
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dunn v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Lawrence Alan Dunn
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Key v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Sheri A. Key
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Parker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Keith T. Parker
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?