Cases 91 - 100 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES et al v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04015
Plaintiff:
ELSIE M. JONES and CHONG HUMMEL
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. , AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. , DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SCHRAVEN et al v. PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, LLP et al
as 2:2015cv03397
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCHRAVEN and KELLY SCHRAVEN
Defendant:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, LLP and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIRST AMERICAN BANK v. CARDINAL RESOURCES LLC et al
as 2:2015mc00417
Garnishee:
THE EAST END FOOD CO-OP FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, UNITED AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, IRON WORKERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and others
Defendant:
BARBARA H. JONES, KEVIN R. JONES, CARDINAL RESOURCES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FIRST AMERICAN BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DAWSON et al v. CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015mc00007
Petitioner:
LONNIE DAWSON, SR. and WENDY DAWSON JONES
Defendant:
CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL and EMMANULE OKOLO
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
JONES v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv07375
Plaintiff:
VANESSA JONES
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
