Cases 101 - 110 of 1,107
Consumers' Research, et al v. FCC, et al
as 23-1091
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Inc., Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
SGCI Holdings III LLC, et al v. FCC
as 23-1083
Appellant:
SGCI Holdings III LLC, TEGNA Inc. and CMG Media Corporation
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Dahua Technology USA Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 23-1073
Petitioner:
Dahua Technology USA Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Dahua Technology, USA Inc v. Federal Communications Commission
as 09/1:23-CA-00206
Plaintiff:
Dahua Technology, USA Inc
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Petitioner:
Dahua Technology USA, Inc.
Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as DC/1:23-CA-01032
Petitioner:
Hikvision USA, Inc.
Defendant:
FCC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Dahua Technology USA, Inc v. Federal Communications Commission
as 23-206
Petitioner:
DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 23-1032
Petitioner:
Hikvision USA, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC v. FCC
as 23-1096
Petitioner:
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T North Carolina, d/b/a AT&T South Carolina
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
USTELECOM THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. FCC, et al
as 23-1010
Petitioner:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, d/b/a AT&T North Carolina, d/b/a AT&T South Carolina
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
