Cases 111 - 120 of 188
United States Attorney, Middle District of Florida- Tampa v. Shoss
as 4:2013mc02409
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney, Middle District of Florida-Tampa Division
Defendant:
Roger Lee Shoss
Fountain v. Enriquez
as 4:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Fountain
Defendant:
Ed Enriquez
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 5110 Washington LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
5110 Washington LLC and Roger Parham
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Macias Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00660
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Macias Enterprises, Inc., Roger Macias and Anna Macias
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Fountain v. Safety Sam Inc. dba Safety Services Company
as 4:2013cv00100
Defendant:
Safety Sam Inc. dba Safety Services Company
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Fountain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00001
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Hospitality Group, LLC and Roger D Stanmore
Fountain v. North American Bancard, LLC
as 4:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
Roger Fountain
Defendant:
North American Bancard, LLC doing business as Pay Anywhere LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Briones v. Cach, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Julie Briones
Defendant:
Cach, LLC and Rogers Law Office, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Iwan v. Kelsoe, Khoury, Rogers, Caughfield & Clark, PC et al
as 4:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Leonard Iwan
Defendant:
Kelsoe, Khoury, Rogers, Caughfield & Clark, PC and Jeffrey L. Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campos v. United States Department of State
as 3:2012cv00697
Plaintiff:
Roger Campos
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
