Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Arizona, State of et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of , Janice K Brewer , William Humble and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. and others
Movant:
Carl Eric Olsen
Intervenor:
Arizona Dispensary Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sedgwick v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2011cv08073
Plaintiff:
Phillip Westel Sedgwick
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jude et al v. Milwaukee, City of
as 2:2010mc00117
Plaintiff:
Frank L Jude, Jr., Wisconsin Department of Justice and Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
Defendant:
Milwaukee, City of
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Davis v. Estate of Salvatore Bonanno et al
as 2:2008cv01942
Plaintiff:
BJ Davis
Defendant:
Estate of Salvatore Bonanno, Rosalie Bonanno, Michael R Saquella and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Svobodova v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02316
Petitioner:
Ludmila Svobodova and Ludmila Svobodova
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Nagy v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02227
Petitioner:
Marga Nagy
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael B. Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fajardo v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01755
Plaintiff:
Jorge Fajardo
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Atalla et al v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01704
Plaintiff:
Jamal Atalla and Nadia Katrangi
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Department of Justice, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
