Cases 11 - 20 of 627
Jeannite v. Picarello et al
as 1:2024cv10445
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Picarello, Jane Doe, John Doe Badge 2407 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Almeida et al v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10408
Plaintiff:
Debra Almeida and Joseph J Santos
Defendant:
John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Demand Dogs, LLC v. Blair
as 3:2023cv13196
Counter Defendant:
Demand Dogs, LLC
Counter Claimant:
John Blair
Cross Defendant:
Keith Smith and Brian Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Porter Jr v. Commonwealth of MA et al
as 4:2023cv40179
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Commonwealth of MA, City of Methuen and John K Murphy
Debtor:
Phyllis M Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Del Toro
as 1:2023cv13112
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Secretary Carlos Del Toro and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Riffey v. The Johns Hopkins University et al
as 1:2023cv12596
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Riffey
Defendant:
The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
