Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Cooper v. Cornerstone Chemical Company
as 2:2020cv01454
Plaintiff:
Mr. James L Cooper
Defendant:
Cornerstone Chemical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Dasean Cooper v. R. Montoya
as 19-56379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R. MONTOYA, Correctional Counselor I, individual and official capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
DASEAN L. COOPER
Eddie Cooper v. Georgia Dept. of Trans., et al
as 19-14230
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THOMAS AVERY, in his official capacity as an area manager for the Georgia Department of Transportation and in his official capacity, and BRAD CLEVELAND, in his official capacity as an area manager of the Georgia Department of Transportation and in his official capacity,
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE L. COOPER
Barry CooperIn re: Barry Cooper
as 19-14133
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: BARRY L. COOPER
Sterling CooperIn re: Sterling Cooper
as 19-6108
Petitioner:
In re: STERLING L. COOPER
Respondent:
MIKE PARRIS
USA v. Adrian Cooper, Sr.
as 19-2557
Defendant / Appellant:
ADRIAN L. COOPER, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Adrian Cooper, Sr.
as 19-2473
Defendant / Appellant:
ADRIAN L. COOPER, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthew Sheffer v. Centre County, et al
as 19-2726
Defendant:
STEPHANIE L. COOPER, Attorney and CENTRE COUNTY
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY EBECK, PA State Trooper, THOMAS KING KISTLER, Common Pleas Judge, CRYSTAL L. HUNDT, Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHN SHEFFER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Sterling Cooper v. Mike Parris
as 19-5485
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE PARRIS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
STERLING L. COOPER
USA v. Kenneth Cooper, Jr.
as 19-1890
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH L. COOPER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
