Cases 21 - 30 of 5,920
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-4660
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KATIE HOBBS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX and others
Caraffa v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-4659
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Employees of ADCRR, KATIE HOBBS, RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and others
Christian v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al.
as 24-4596
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as: Dietitian at Saguaro Correctional Facility, HOWARD KOMORI, Hawaii Contract Monitor, UNKNOWN, Pitz: Trinity Food Service Supervisor at Saguaro Correctional Facility, aka per Doc 47 also known as Rubi Pitz and others
Plaintiff:
TARYN CHRISTIAN
Regbol v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 3:2024cv04444
Defendant:
Democratic Party, United States of America and Federal Election Commission
Plaintiff:
Arcelio Joseph Regbol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv02146
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER
Wheeler v. Brager, et al.
as 24-4440
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, Board Members, MARY BETH SCOW, MARILYN KIRKPATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO WHEELER
Singh v. Robertson, et al.
as 24-4423
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest and JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. SINGH
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv02034
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER
America First Policy Institute et al v. Biden, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Frank LaRose, Beth Van Duyne, Suzanne Pinnow and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Adrianne R. Todman, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
