Cases 31 - 40 of 2,607
Harris v. The City of New York
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective and others
Knight v. City of New York
as 24-982
Plaintiff:
CAVALIER D. KNIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and EDWARD A. CABAN
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-2350
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Hansen v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02808
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hansen
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Christopher Catechis, Jason Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. ยง 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Taylor v. The City of New York
as 24-915
Plaintiff:
NAKIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Lieutenant CHRISTOPHER SIANI, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
WB and B Executive Search v. City of New York
as 24-845
Plaintiff:
WB AND B EXECUTIVE SEARCH
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRAD LANDER, in his capacity as Comptroller of the City of New York, OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK CITY COMPTROLLER and others
Philbert v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-804
Plaintiff:
SHAKEMA PHILBERT
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CITY OF NEW YORK, CAMILLE FORBES and others
Muzumala v. City of New York
as 24-806
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRONXWORKS, PROJECT RENEWAL and others
Taylor v. The City of New York
as 24-787
Plaintiff:
NAKIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Lieutenant CHRISTOPHER SIANI, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
