Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Santo et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Frank Santo, Jr. and Gina M. Brody
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Pennsylvania Business Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gorham-DiMaggio v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kim Gorham-DiMaggio
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., LP, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Douglas v. Countrywide Home Loans et al
as 1:2007cv02814
Plaintiff:
Heron J. Douglas
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Equifax Credit Information Services, Experian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Mauro v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01268
Plaintiff:
Maria Mauro and Maria Mauro
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Peter J. Dawson and BMG Advisory Services, Ltd.
Cross Claimant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Peter J. Dawson and BMG Advisory Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Bellettieri, Fonte & Laundio, P.C.
as 1:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Bellettieri, Fonte & Laudonio, P.C., Anthony Bellettieri, Robert V. Fonte and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Bellettieri, Fonte & Laundio, P.C.
as 7:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Bellettieri, Fonte & Laudonio, P.C., Anthony Bellettieri, Robert V. Fonte and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
