Cases 41 - 50 of 511
Chism v. City of Chicago, Illinois, The et al
as 1:2021cv05835
Plaintiff:
Xavier Chism
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, The, Jason E Brown, Sgt. Michael E. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keia Yates, et al v. City of Chicago
as 21-2953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEIA YATES, LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNNY JIMMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Prince et al v. Attorney General of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv05659
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Prince, Angel Prince, Earl Prince, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Attorney General of Illinois, City of Chicago, Calahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jevarreo Kelley-Lomax v. City of Chicago
as 21-2891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEVARREO KELLEY-LOMAX
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Rigsby v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-6125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, of the Great State of Illinois; in the individual and official capacites, STATE OF ILLINOIS, in the individual and official capacites and FNU LNU, in the individual and official capacites; any other State or City doing reparations for slave descendants
David Stieglitz v. City of Chicago
as 21-2784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID STIEGLITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv04876
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Plantan, City Colleges of Chicago and CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bill James v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILL JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIM FOXX
James Garner v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, TIFFANY WEBB and DOOR AND WINDOW GUARD SYSTEMS, (D.A.W.G.S.)
Tina Turner v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIMBERLY M. FOXX, Cook County State Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
