Cases 51 - 60 of 95
Recycle for Change v. City Of Oakland
as 3:2015cv05093
Plaintiff:
Recycle for Change
Defendant:
City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Joe Hemp's First Hemp Bank and Distribution Network et al v. City Of Oakland et al
as 4:2015cv05053
Plaintiff:
Joe Hemp's First Hemp Bank and Distribution Network and David Clancy
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and Gregory Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Building Industry Association - Bay Area v. City Of Oakland
as 3:2015cv03392
Plaintiff:
Building Industry Association - Bay Area
Defendant:
City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hills Conservation Network v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 3:2015cv01057
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency , Karen Armes , Mark Ghilarducci and others
Plaintiff:
Hills Conservation Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Irlina v. State of California et al
as 4:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Alisa Irlina
Defendant:
State of California and City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Missud, I, et al v. Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture, et al
as 13-16510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I and JULIE E. MISSUD, and those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
OAKLAND COLISUEM JOINT VENTURE, CITY OF OAKLAND, ALAMEDA COUNTY and others
City of Oakland v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-15391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney for the Northern District of California
City of Oakland v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv05245
Plaintiff:
City of Oakland
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Melinda Haag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Missud v. Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture et al
as 3:2012cv02967
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Missud
Defendant:
Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture, City of Oakland, Alameda County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
