Cases 51 - 56 of 56
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ABRAHAM
as 04-1141
Defendant-Appellee:
ABRAHAM SPENCER Secretary of Energy, and GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and others
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 03-1498
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee:
GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and Spencer Abraham, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 03-1207
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and Spencer Abraham, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 02-1134
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee:
GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of Energy, GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and others
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 01-1566
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee:
GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of Energy
CON ED V ENERGY
as 00-1370
Defendant-Appellee:
BILL RICHARDSON, Secretary of Energy and GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals
Plaintiff-Appellant:
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
