Other Statutes Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 51 - 60 of 279
United States of America v. $27,683 In U.S. Currency et al
as 0:2018mc00078
Defendant: $3,300 in U.S. Currency, $1,675 in U.S. Currency, $30,000 in U.S. Currency and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Shaofen Hoa, Juan Juan Du, Xain Mei Zhang and others
United States of America v. $42,000 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2018mc00046
Defendant: $42,000 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Portland Food Mart et al v. United States of America, The We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv01457
Plaintiff: Portland Food Mart and Harpeet Tandon
Defendant: United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2022
United States of America v. $393,677.98 Siezed From Home Federal Savings Bank, Account No. 327000869
as 0:2018mc00034
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $393,677.98 Siezed From Home Federal Savings Bank, Account No. 327000869
Claimant: Roderick C. Thompson
United States of America v. Stoflet
as 0:2018mc00035
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Betty Stoflet
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Olseth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018mc00036
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Bret K. Olseth and Ecreative Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Vera
as 0:2018cv01314
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Armando Vera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245
United States of America v. Varrie
as 0:2018mc00022
Respondent: Charles M. Varrie
Petitioner: United States of America
United States of America v. $9,980 in U.S. Currency et al
as 0:2018mc00019
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $9,980 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Michael Paul McDonough
United States of America v. Alm
as 0:2018cv00647
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Robert Nathan Alm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?