Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,865
Caraffa v. Quinn, et al.
as 24-1416
Plaintiff: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant: T. QUINN, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Caraffa v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1423
Plaintiff: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, named as ADCRR, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Employees of ADCRR and others
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Non-Party Alamo Group Inc.
Defendant: Bazooka Farmstar, LLC
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff: MARONG LIU and NO PARTY
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ALISSA L. EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff: MAHMOUD PAZOKI and NO PARTY
Not Yet Classified: ANTONY BLINKEN, DOUGLASS BENNING, CHIP LAITINEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10562
Plaintiff: Mark Alan Adams
Defendant: United States of America, Michigan, State of, Saginaw, County of and others
McClure v. Citrenbaum, et al.
as 24-1141
Plaintiff: JOHN PATRICK MCCLURE
Defendant: LEWIS CITRENBAUM, named as Yavapai County Attorney, ERIC JOSEPH CREMONA, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Eric Cremona's Roommate and others
Smith v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-1104
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNKNOWN PARTY, Supervisor Andrew and GO2BANK CUSTOMER SERVICE
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 24-1102
Plaintiff: GENE EDWARD SCOTT
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY
Johnson v. Nordstrom, Inc., et al.
as 24-1074
Plaintiff: AMANDA JOHNSON
Defendant: NORDSTROM, INC., Headquarters and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Julie and Will, Nordstrom, Customer Care

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?