Cases 1 - 10 of 17
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FREEMAN v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC.
as 1:2018cv03844
Plaintiff:
DEMONA FREEMAN
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholson et al v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Douglas Grimes, Jeff Nicholson, Greg Serbon and others
Defendant:
Herbert Jr Smith, Lavetta Sparks-Wade, Carolyn D Rogers and others
Intervenor:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00933
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
