Cases 91 - 100 of 479
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. NOIT45282018 v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations et al
as 2:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. NOIT45282018 and A
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, Daimler Trucks North America and California Truck Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hafen v. Muir
as 2:2019cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Jeanne Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
AAAG California v. Kisana et al
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Jack Metcalf, Abdul R. Kisana, Luxury Auto Group and others
Plaintiff:
AAAG California
Receiver:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hafen v. Wells et al
as 2:2019cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Igor Kovalenko, Adam Wells, Rosalie Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Ratheal v. USA
as 2:2019cv00969
Plaintiff:
Rodney S. Ratheal
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hafen v. Evans et al
as 2:2019cv00895
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Nyla Evans, Michael Williams and Walter Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
McKenney, Richard the Estate of et al v. USA
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Estate of Richard McKenney, Cynthia McKenney Craft and McKenney, Richard the Estate of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hafen v. Thurgood et al
as 2:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Brant Thurgood, Barbara Thurgood, Tyler Thurgood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Call et al
as 2:2019cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Holly Call, FHC LLC, THE FHC Intervivos Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Puchalski et al v. TCFC HotelCo et al
as 2:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Dakota Mountain Lodge Homeowners Association, Hilton Grand Vacations Management and TCFC HotelCo
Plaintiff:
Carla Lynn Furuno and Jeffery Lucian Puchalski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
