Cases 21 - 30 of 23,389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Green v. Pen Fed Credit Union et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Dennis Green
Defendant:
Pen Fed Credit Union, Christopher J. Martin, Brian Cassin and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
McElroy v. Dawson County Municipality
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Dawson County Municipality, Dawson County Misdemeanor Probation, Dawson County Felony Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper et al v. Brunswick Housing Authority
as 2:2024cv00075
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Onika Davis
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McElroy v. Beyers et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Superior Court Judge Karen Beyers, David Whitman, Kacey Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
